Re: Difference between tsql and libsybdb
Alberto Pulvirenti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.tds.freetds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJNp6N0N8mzUZga2qgOanhiMz8ZRE2kUOFTAhihhFT3LdgQb+w@mail.gmail.com> |
Dear James, I still want to test a little bit more, but it seems you found the problem, indeed. About the DBA, I agree with you but that's the life. How could it become a runtime option? A useful option could be to set it as a boolean data member in the DBLIBCONTEXT object, and add it as an option in the dbinit() function, setting as default its current behaviour. Thanks Best and thankful regards Alberto 2012/9/29 James K. Lowden <[email protected]> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:11:57 +0200 > Alberto Pulvirenti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The problem, in this logon trigger is that it has set to OFF the > > following three variables: > > > > set ansi_warnings off > > set ansi_padding off > > set concat_null_yields_null off > > > > > > and the admin of this instance told me that he will NEVER switch them > > to ON. Then I must find a way to access this instance having these > > setting as they are currently. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb326598.aspx > > I see now. I never used logon triggers, and was only dimly aware of > their existence. Now I am slightly lessly dimly aware of them. > > It's too bad your DBA has chosen not to use his power for good. > Instead of ensuring that every logon has particular session properties > he deeems necessary (by issuing the very statements you found), he's > instead prevented logons by clients that don't. > > Sigh. But you have the power, because you have the compiler. Look in > src/dblib/dblib.c for the phrase "we're not an ODBC driver". Delete > that line, recompile, and try to connect. If that works, we know > what the problem is. Other than your DBA, of course. > > In option_flag2 in the TDS 7 login packet is a bit that signals to the > server that the client is an ODBC driver. It's turned off in db-lib > because that's how db-lib always worked. Nothing prevents the FreeTDS > db-lib from turning that bit on, or from making it an option. I think > you will find the bit presents no problem at all. (Curious, though, > isn't it, that it's not the vendor but your own organization that > imposes this effort on you?) > > If you would like to make this a run-time option for FreeTDS db-lib, > I'm sure others would find it beneficial, too. > > HTH. > > --jkl > _______________________________________________ > FreeTDS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds >