some thoughts
Marko Schütz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.debugging.ddd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87ej2rdjqn.wl%[email protected]> |
Dear All, I just subscribed to the list, but have been a user of DDD for quite some time. The reason I subscribed is that I found some postings on the web that I wanted to comment on. "rewrite DDD in C++" IMHO that will tie up quite some effort. But will it bring substantial improvement? I doubt that very much. I have not looked at the source code of DDD yet, but I assume/hope that it's fairly clean. DDD has not seen substantial development in quite some time and I seriously doubt that rewriting it in C++ would be a good way to invest the little volunteer effort that goes into it right now. I also doubt that this is a direction that would attract many new volunteers. "change to Qt, GTKmm" While I agree that the GUI feels antiquated, again I do not think the effort required by a project like this would be well invested. Pretty much for the same reasons as above. I consider forking DDD into two projects, one using Qt the other using GTKmm a very bad decision as this will further divert any contributions to the project. "complete control by keystrokes" That I actually think would be a good way forward. "debugging" This would be my number one priority. Fix all currently outstanding bugs, collect user feedback on bugs not yet reported, fix those too. In general make DDD more solid. Best regards, Marko _______________________________________________ ddd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (NetBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkjs+9AACgkQOrTq/v3ACNqpBQCgjU4Hzv7vhk1qzTho1cvDeykU wcsAn39WsfwNChYdLsI09qwe0gUuJLfj =j5Iu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----