Re: some thoughts
Jose María Gómez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.debugging.ddd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1223582207.6662.9.camel@jmgv-laptop> |
Well, although you have read that things in the web, real plans are not like that. We have discussed that things in the distribution list but web page is not up to day. Peter Wainwright has done a really good you decoupling logic from gui and it is easier to do the core in one place and a qt, gtkmm ot whatever you want interface to use it. Peter is working in a gtkmm interface and at this time there is a branch in svn for that. At this time I am the official maintainer but I sent an email to the list seeking a new one. Today I have receive an email from Peter offering to be the one to take care of this. I think it is a really good news because he has been working in code a lot. Thanks for your thoughts and I hope DDD to be better shortly. On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 14:28 -0400, Marko Schütz wrote > Dear All, > > I just subscribed to the list, but have been a user of DDD for quite > some time. > > The reason I subscribed is that I found some postings on the web that > I wanted to comment on. > > "rewrite DDD in C++" > IMHO that will tie up quite some effort. But will it bring substantial > improvement? I doubt that very much. I have not looked at the source > code of DDD yet, but I assume/hope that it's fairly clean. DDD has not > seen substantial development in quite some time and I seriously doubt > that rewriting it in C++ would be a good way to invest the little > volunteer effort that goes into it right now. I also doubt that this > is a direction that would attract many new volunteers. > > "change to Qt, GTKmm" While I agree that the GUI feels antiquated, > again I do not think the effort required by a project like this would > be well invested. Pretty much for the same reasons as above. I > consider forking DDD into two projects, one using Qt the other using > GTKmm a very bad decision as this will further divert any > contributions to the project. > > "complete control by keystrokes" > That I actually think would be a good way forward. > > "debugging" > This would be my number one priority. Fix all currently outstanding > bugs, collect user feedback on bugs not yet reported, fix those > too. In general make DDD more solid. > > Best regards, > > Marko > _______________________________________________ ddd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd