Re: Patches & SendTo for regular files

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Bernard Jungen <[email protected]>:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I've been playing with rox source code lately and came up with 3 patches to be
> > found as attachments. These have been generated from my local git repo, having
> > failed to generate a useable fork at repo.or.cz.
> 
> You might just need to push to it. I can't remember, but they might
> start off empty. Did you get an error?

Cloning it downloads and then gives me this message:
   warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.

Unusable repo.
Apparently there's a problem at repo.or.cz not initializing forks correctly.
Anyone else has a clue?

Otherwise, how much more time-wasting is that for you to integrate generated patches?

> I'm not sure the compile option on the menu is a good idea, though.
> For most users, the directory will be read-only and this option will
> just generate errors. There's a Makefile in src which builds it...
> surely every developer has a short-cut for "save-and-run-make"?

Of course you're right. Let's say that first patch was a test in using git :-)

Cheers,

Bernard.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects