Fwd: Question about maintenance of ROX-Filer
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:09:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.desktop.rox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ Just found this in my spam folder (which I normally don't check at all). It was sent directly to me, so forwarding it to the list. The bug in question has been fixed. Please send correspondence about ROX-Filer to the list. ] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Barry Kauler <[email protected]> Date: 7 April 2010 14:26 Subject: Question about maintenance of ROX-Filer To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Message body follows: Thomas, I think that ROX-Filer was originally your baby, I was wondering if you still have any input to its maintenance. I'm the founder and lead developer of Puppy Linux, and ROX-Filer has been our central file and desktop manager for years. We found a serious focus bug when moving up to GTK 2.18, which forced me to stay with 2.16.6. I reported the bug in November 2009, got no response until today, the bug was closed with the comment that it is "intentional behaviour". I was astounded. It's a bug that renders ROX-Filer virtually unusable, as many other have also found. Some found a fix, that they got from an Ubuntu forum I think, and one of our guys showed how to patch the Rox code to fix it. I posted a link to this fix on the bug-reporter, but your guy 'kerofin' just ignored it and closed the bug. I'm just astounded. The bug I originally reported is: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=107023&aid=2889906&group_id=7023 Someone else posted about the same bug, got the same response and it was closed: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2925212&group_id=7023&atid=107023 I have opened another bug report: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2983200&group_id=7023&atid=107023 This is my forum thread with the fix: http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=01389 It would be great if the developers will recognise that the behaviour is not "intentional" and is a bad bug. The fix is there, waiting to be applied. Regards, Barry Kauler http://bkhome.org/blog/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev