Re: "success"
"Kris Amy" <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:32:43 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Folks, What is actually required in terms of hardware for this? I'm just browsing around on that website and unsure of what you need. Cheers, Kris -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 20 October 2006 11:11 PM To: Hardware Subject: Re: [Hardware] "success" Sorry, wrong "from" adress This is a forwarded message From: Guerric Meurice de Dormale <[email protected]> To: Hardware <hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]> Date: Thursday, October 19, 2006, 4:23:06 PM Subject: [Hardware] "success" ===8<==============Original message text=============== Hello, Ok, I guess everything is clear between you and John now. Talking about devices, if the biggest device you "can" (afford) work with is a Spartan3E, there is maximum 14.5 kSlices and 36 bRAMS. >From my point of view, it is not possible to fit a fully unrolled RC5 core with such amount of slices. (or I will be very happy to know how!). For such kind of devices, a partially unrolled core should probably be the best solution (with let's say 3 key schedule stages and 1 decrypt stage). I'm not only saying that as I'm working on fully unrolled core and with bigger FPGA: we worked on the problem during the first half of the year and I really can't figure out how to reduce further our ~17500 slices. I'm currently adding other optimizations, but only a couple of hundred slices are going to be saved. Does a partially unrolled core can fit with the schedule of your work ? (I'm not saying you to do that, just thinking about what's possible) -- Guerric Meurice de Dormale UCL DICE/Crypto Group http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/ MK> David, MK> It is too large for the largest device I can afford, a Spartan 3E - 1600 MK> on board at Digilentinc.com MK> There are larger Spartan 3 chips but I don't know of any on eval boards. MK> Estimated frequency based on Synplify Pro for a Spartan 3 is 63MHz - not MK> that impressive MK> Virtex 4 - 127MHz MK> As Mr. Bass pointed out, there are issues with a pipeline delay that I MK> haven't figured out yet. MK> -- MK> Martin K ===8<===========End of original message text=========== _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware