Re: speed differences between seemingly identical cores
Andrew Hime <[email protected]> Mon, 14 May 2012 13:41:05 -0500 (CDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.rc5 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <27607238.286329.1337020865833.JavaMail.root@vznit170130> |
Gotta be benchmark, any of the quad-core Xeons in the Macs are going to do better than 56Mnodes/sec. On 05/14/12, Mike Reed<[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jeff, How long did you run this for? Is it a summary result or benchmark numbers? Kind regards, Mike On May 14, 2012 4:20 PM, "Jeff Leigh" <[email protected] > wrote: dnetc v2.9110-519-CTR-11040104 for Mac OS X (Darwin 11.4.0). Mac OS 10.7.4 Dual 2.8 GHz Quad Core Xeon E5462 I noticed a speed difference between the Universal and the x86 download. The Universal download is running OGR faster. Tested using the cj-asm-sse2 core. x86 - 44,756,674 nodes/s Universal - 56,124,883 nodes/s _______________________________________________ rc5 mailing list rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5 ---------- _______________________________________________ rc5 mailing list rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5 _______________________________________________ rc5 mailing list rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5