Re: tarball URL conventions and sptools
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:06:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.package |
|---|---|
| Organization | What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> wrote: > How does sp-download handle dependencies? It doesn't, yet. There is no standard for expressing dependencies yet. > Maybe simply either a symlink (or copy), e.g. > daemontools.tar.bz2 -> daemontools-0.76.tar.bz2 > or a file named, e.g. current, which contains the newest current > version, e.g. '0.76'. Something like the file would be better: that way, we would not have to rename the tarball after downloading it, and we would not have to unpack it to find out what version it is. paul