On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:33:25AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > Paul Jarc:
>
> > Charlie Brady <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > >> But there are delegations: if you have a
> > >> publicly registered DNS domain, you can publish a package like
> > >> /package/host/yourdomain.com/foo-1.0 without registering it with Dan.
> > >
> > > But is that good enough? What if somebody else were to one day
> > > acquire yourdomain.com, and has a package called foo-1.0?
> >
> > Dunno. Mail-Followup-To set.
>
> this (registering every package thru dan bernstein) is not a good solution,
> given that more and more packages will reside in /package, with growing
> popularity.
>
> i would like to solicit comments, preferably including one from mr.
> bernstein himself, about installing "deputies", who are to keep the central
> registry consistent and resolve conflicts as those pointed out by mr.
> brady.
Instead
/package/`md5sum foo-1.0.tar.gz | cut -d' ' -f1`/foo-1.0
I have no idea why anybody finds it informative for the sysadm to have
these subcategories
/package/admin
/package/math
They are just a cause for arguments where a particular package
belongs. It is easier to maintain a separate database about packages
which are math or admin related.
Mate
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.