Re: is the "https" patch necessary
Peter Conrad <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:52:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.publicfile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:32:21AM -0600, [email protected] wrote: > To run a stunneled httpd on the https port in the > /publics directory---after running configure---I change the run file to > > #!/bin/sh > exec 2>&1 > exec envuidgid root softlimit -o20 -d50000 tcpserver -vDRHl0 -b50 -c100 0 443 stunnel -f -l /usr/local/publicfile/bin/httpd -- httpds /publics/file > > This works for me with an _unpatched_ httpd as well. That depends on the client you're using. Some clients (like Netscape I think) will issue requests like this: GET /some/path/file.html HTTP/1.0 Server: www.example.org while others will use requests like this: GET https://www.example.org/some/path/file.html HTTP/1.0 The former will work with the unpatched publicfile, the latter won't. Bye, Peter -- Peter Conrad Tel: +49 6102 / 80 99 072 [ t]ivano Software GmbH Fax: +49 6102 / 80 99 071 Bahnhofstr. 18 63263 Neu-Isenburg