Re: is the "https" patch necessary
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:15:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.publicfile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter Conrad <[email protected]> writes: > GET https://www.example.org/some/path/file.html HTTP/1.0 > > The former will work with the unpatched publicfile, the latter won't. Looks like a proxy request, and publicfile is not supposed to be an HTTP/HTTPS proxy, is it? -- Matthias Andree GPG encrypted mail welcome, unless it's unsolicited commercial email.