Re: publicfile under OpenBSD 3.7

On 30/08/05, Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> wrote:
> "fixed"?  It's not broken.  On your particular system, with your particul=
ar
> architecture, tools, and library versions, it's not high enough.  But the
> default isn't broken -- it works just fine on lots of systems.

It's a default install under a default install of OpenBSD 3.7 on x86
hardware. Just because it works fine on lots of systems doesn't
mean this shouldn't be classed as a problem.

If the default lead to memory allocation errors on every single
architecture would you class it as broken?