Re: new implementation?

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Russell Nelson wrote:

> Is there going to be a new implementation of sigs soon?  I'm needing a
> reliable public key system.  There are some problems with sigs-0.50,
> e.g. the signing code isn't in any library, nor in any file designed to
> be used like a library.
>

I'd also be interested in a library version of the sigs code, and have
been frustrated by its current structure as simply a set of command-line
utilities that are difficult to integrate into a larger program.  I had
been hoping that djb's planned rewrite would have been done already, but
am about to begin implementing some code around OpenSSL's libcrypt RSA or
DSA methods instead.


-- 
Jeff Lawson   http://www.bovine.net/  http://www.distributed.net/~bovine/
[email protected]  [email protected]  [email protected]
Don't waste those cycles!  Put them to use!  http://www.distributed.net/