Re: new implementation?
Russell Nelson <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:06:32 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.sigs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff Lawson writes: > ... OpenSSL's libcrypt RSA or DSA methods instead. Yeah, I would just go do that myself, but I want to integrate this code into qmail, and frankly mixing anybody's code except for djb's into qmail is a recipe for a security hole. Gonna implement server-signed messages, with public keys in the DNS. I'd just go ahead and copy code out of sign.c and match.c, but if djb is planning to rewrite sigs-0.50, I'd rather wait. Dan? Any schedule for sigs-0.70? -- --My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | Can I recommend python? Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Just a thought. 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | -Dr. Jamey Hicks Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX |