Re: size of supervise/ !
Otavio Exel <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:14:59 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.syslog |
|---|---|
| Organization | Economatica Ltda |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > in case it matters: the filesystem format is jfs on a raid-1 device; Laurent Bercot wrote: > A journaled filesystem will probably store every change in some way. sure! but I'd think that journals were kept somewhere else; > I suspect that the journalling of the status file has much to do with > the size of your supervise directory. as I was just telling Daryl (after reading your message) I'm sure that's it! > Check your journals; clean them, if possible and appropriate. this will take some time as I'm absolute newbie in journaling filesystems; I'll post back to the list; > I generally suggest having supervise directories in a tmpfs (or any > other RAM filesystem). looks like a great idea! I wonder how you do it... my first though is to just create symlinks pointing to the ramfs; I assume supervise will do the rest even in a clean ramfs (after a reboot); or do I need to do something else? []s & thanks! -- Otavio Exel /<\oo/>\ [email protected]