Re: licensing question

Kurt Newman wrote:

> I have no intention of writing derivation work, but I guess to
> technically obide by these rules, I wouldn't be able to provide a binary
> rpm with my software because of a newer libc errno patch that must be
> applied before compilation (url:
> http://moni.csi.hu/pub/glibc-2.3.1/daemontools-0.76.errno.patch).
> 

AFAIK, The code compile cleanly if you use dietlibc. You could build a 
RPM without the patch that way.

If you want to know how to do, I think the Mandrake Qmail SRPMS have an 
option to compile with dietlibc.

You will find the Mandrake SRPM daemon tools there too:
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/rpmhelp/Mandrake/djbware/9.1/SRPMS/daemontools-0.76-6rph.src.rpm
with the errno patch.

And here for Qmail
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/rpmhelp/Mandrake/djbware/9.2/SRPMS/qmail-........


Thomas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBFM/vA/52wvuLgaERAjXJAKD5FNp2mHuQ8Tjdgib9BB0HPPw40gCg2o1F
J8Vqd92GDVipFi81OHebwVs=
=T5mE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----