Re: licensing question

> Kurt Newman wrote:
> > I have no intention of writing derivation work, but I guess to
> > technically obide by these rules, I wouldn't be able to provide a binary
> > rpm with my software because of a newer libc errno patch that must be
> > applied before compilation (url:
> > http://moni.csi.hu/pub/glibc-2.3.1/daemontools-0.76.errno.patch).

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:49:50PM +0100, Thomas Mangin wrote:
> AFAIK, The code compile cleanly if you use dietlibc. You could build a 
> RPM without the patch that way.

Or add --include errno.h to conf-cc

-- 
Raul