Re: [Opencxx-users] refining the Synopsis APIs

Markus Elfring wrote:
>>Note that Synopsis already contains an ASG, though confusingly calls it 'AST'.
> 
> 
> Please consider that the syntax tree can also become a syntax graph like in the Keystone approach.
> 
> S = syntax or semantic
> T = tree, G = graph
> 
> Is more "confusion" needed?

What exactly is your point ? The (mis-)use of acronyms ?

Can you show where the syntax tree becomes a graph ? It never occured to
me that syntax would have an intrinsic graph structure (as long as you
don't start to connect symbol declarations with their actual use, but
that's exactly what the ASG is about).
I'm not (yet) that familiar with keystone, so if you could post a concrete
example of a code snippet that has graph structure (in its keystone representation)
that would help.

Thanks,
		Stefan