Re: [Opencxx-users] refining the Synopsis APIs
"Markus Elfring" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.documentation.synopsis |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://freemail.web.de/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> What exactly is your point ? The (mis-)use of acronyms ? My point is disambiguation in C++ and natural languages to avoid misunderstandings. > Can you show where the syntax tree becomes a graph ? It never occured to > me that syntax would have an intrinsic graph structure (as long as you > don't start to connect symbol declarations with their actual use, but > that's exactly what the ASG is about). I can not show it. The specific term is rarely used by Keystone. It seems that it is related to other documents as a background. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cis?q=%22abstract+syntax+graph%22 Regards, Markus