Re: Re: software design clarification
Bernhard Fischer <[email protected]> Thu, 3 May 2007 22:50:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.documentation.synopsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >>Now that's quite a list. How do these issues relate to each other ? > >Do we want to update the documentation together to show the relationships? >http://synopsis.fresco.org/docs/DevGuide/type-analysis.html > > >>Why is any work you'd possibly use on the C++ frontend dependent on >>questions relating to AST/ASG nomenclature ? >> > >I prefer the clear separation of interface layers, don't you? This counter-question is nothing i can relate to an answer. Care to give an example of what subject you have in mind when talking about this, on trunk? > > >>And, how do you think template processing will be 'resolved' ? By magic ? >> > >No, I am just looking for the places where missing features can be split >into smaller pieces. Like? > > >>I don't think your approach is very practical. If we all did that nothing >>would ever happen. >> > >Why? I insist on refactorings and redesigns that will hopefully prevent >us from more work. I imagine to complete the internal class >infrastructure by small building blocks. Please give some simple examples that i may be able to code up, as a proposal.