Re: Re: software design clarification

Bernhard Fischer <[email protected]> Thu, 3 May 2007 22:50:53 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.documentation.synopsis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
>
>>Now that's quite a list. How do these issues relate to each other ?
>
>Do we want to update the documentation together to show the relationships?
>http://synopsis.fresco.org/docs/DevGuide/type-analysis.html
>
>
>>Why is any work you'd possibly use on the C++ frontend dependent on
>>questions relating to AST/ASG nomenclature ?
>>  
>
>I prefer the clear separation of interface layers, don't you?

This counter-question is nothing i can relate to an answer. Care to give
an example of what subject you have in mind when talking about this, on
trunk?
>
>
>>And, how do you think template processing will be 'resolved' ? By magic ?
>>  
>
>No, I am just looking for the places where missing features can be split 
>into smaller pieces.

Like?
>
>
>>I don't think your approach is very practical. If we all did that nothing
>>would ever happen.
>>  
>
>Why? I insist on refactorings and redesigns that will hopefully prevent 
>us from more work. I imagine to complete the internal class 
>infrastructure by small building blocks.

Please give some simple examples that i may be able to code up, as a proposal.