Re: Reserved word

Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> missing reserved words for g++, see attachment
> 
> some have added comment "with in C not C++",
> added for completeness only.

Sorry, I don't understand that patch. What is 'RID_BOOL'
for example ? Where is it defined ? And what is '_Bool' ?
Is it really recognized by gcc as your patch seems to suggest ?

By the way, as you may notice from the new Lexer code, it is
now easy to enable *any* keywords at runtime. I plan to provide
the possibility to make the Lexer C++ compliant, or C, or adapt
to any compiler. Up to now that was a compile time setting...

Thanks,
		Stefan