Re: parameters for actions?

Dennis Ponos wrote:
> ...
 >
> Yes.  I think that this approach would give me the generic functionality
> I am looking for.  The parameters are specified in the XML.  There is
> only one Action, which performs generically, and the engine remains
> stable. 
> 
> This gives me a lot to think about in regards to a possible design for
> my "generic engine". 

You might want to read the thread "SwiXML robustitude" from ealier this 
month which includes suggested enhancements (my post of 1/14 in 
particular) that include what you were/are looking for.  At the end of 
the thread Wolf indicates an interest in adopting some of the suggestions.

-- ced


-- 
Chuck Dillon
Senior Software Engineer
NimbleGen Systems Inc.