Re: Re: parameters for actions?

Thanks Chuck, 

That discussion does indeed contain information on exactly what I'm
looking for.  Your suggestions sound right on target. 



On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 06:46, Chuck Dillon wrote:
> Dennis Ponos wrote:
> > ...
>  >
> > Yes.  I think that this approach would give me the generic functionality
> > I am looking for.  The parameters are specified in the XML.  There is
> > only one Action, which performs generically, and the engine remains
> > stable. 
> > 
> > This gives me a lot to think about in regards to a possible design for
> > my "generic engine". 
> 
> You might want to read the thread "SwiXML robustitude" from ealier this 
> month which includes suggested enhancements (my post of 1/14 in 
> particular) that include what you were/are looking for.  At the end of 
> the thread Wolf indicates an interest in adopting some of the suggestions.
> 
> -- ced
>