Re: FormLayout & Swixml Marriage
Gerald Bauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.embedded.carlsbad-cubes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Kate, > something else we need, or, *I* think we need, > though is support of sub > tags... for example > > <combobox ....> > <option... ></option> > <option... ></option> > </combobox> > > I know wolf doesn't want to support the dynamic > population of combo > boxes in SWIXML as it starts to veer off into the > world of functional > xml instead of strict layout xml but as a 3rd party > it's something I'd > really like to add. But, there isn't a good way to > handle those "option" > tags at the moment as there isn't a way to just add > a component to a > combo box in the way SWIXML does things. Kate, if you're looking for a XUL motor/browser/runtime that goes way beyond layout why not check out the Luxor XUL toolkit @ http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net ? Luxor already supports populating input controls/widgets such as comboboxes using XML data sources. - Gerald PS: If you need some ideas about a plugin "architecture" check out Luxor Plugin Central site a.k.a. Petra online @ http://petra.sourceforge.net PPS: I hope you don't get me wrong. Swix is a fantastic piece of software and I fully support Swix but as Wolf outlined Swix and Luxor follow different design principles. Luxor for example embraces scripting, CSS styling and much more. ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca