Re: FormLayout & Swixml Marriage

Gerald Bauer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.embedded.carlsbad-cubes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Kate,

> something else we need, or, *I* think we need,
> though is support of sub 
> tags... for example
> 
> <combobox ....>
>     <option... ></option>
>     <option... ></option>
> </combobox>
> 
> I know wolf doesn't want to support the dynamic
> population of combo 
> boxes in SWIXML as it starts to veer off into the
> world of functional 
> xml instead of strict layout xml but as a 3rd party
> it's something I'd 
> really like to add. But, there isn't a good way to
> handle those "option" 
> tags at the moment as there isn't a way to just add
> a component to a 
> combo box in the way SWIXML does things.  

  Kate, if you're looking for a XUL
motor/browser/runtime that goes way beyond layout why
not check out the Luxor XUL toolkit @
http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net ?

  Luxor already supports populating input
controls/widgets such as comboboxes using XML data
sources.

  - Gerald

PS: If you need some ideas about a plugin
"architecture" check out Luxor Plugin Central site
a.k.a. Petra online @ http://petra.sourceforge.net

PPS: I hope you don't get me wrong. Swix is a
fantastic piece of software and I fully support Swix
but as Wolf outlined Swix and Luxor follow different
design principles. Luxor for example embraces
scripting, CSS styling and much more.


______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.