Re: Has IBM changed its licenses?
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> And, depending on how you read the "and", It may be that downloading is > fine (such as downloading for eventual transfer to the big box), but under > condition "2", downloading AND using it on the 2nd machine is not OK. I would have expected an 'OR' in that position - perhaps an oversight. There is still the general stricture in the IPLA itself about copying. But I'd still like to know if this text is new. I haven't checked all of the documents that contain it, but the ones I _have_ looked at have change dates of '12/20/02' - which is the same date as the Announcement Letter and would imply it's a single action. There is another interpretation someone suggested yesterday. The previous ban on copying didn't have a specific remedy for breaches, other than invalidating the original license. The 'new' wording does. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/