Re: posting styles and licensing
Sam Knutson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
At 05:03 PM 10/11/2003, PDW wrote:
> I believe the same analysis would be true for
>Hercules, in which case your implication that running Herc on a 9672 is
>some sort of safe harbor is probably incorrect.
I was lucky enough to speak to Dr. Aleksandr Shmid about ISX
http://www.iissolutions.com at
a SHARE conference. It is a real and impressive technology allowing older
(and newer) workloads to be run in virtual machines on MVS without IBM VM.
In his comments and reading the companies web site I am not led to believe
that this (existing licenses for the box would be invalid for images
running in virtual machines) was the case. We did not specifically discuss
licensing or intellectual property this is just my impression based on the
general information and the lack of any of these issues being mentioned as
a concern.
Hercules running on a real IBM mainframe would have the same issues if any
existed as ISX I think.
It is at least an interesting scenario for comparison.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson
CBT Tape http://www.cbttape.org
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ArdFIC/hP.FAA/ySSFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/