Re: More questions [from herc/390]

"tsagoth" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--- In [email protected], "somitcw" <somitcw@e...> wrote:
> >The poster from then said that while IBM had given
> >up on their distribution right, they maintained
> >their IP and that meant no modifying and handing
> >out source.
> 
> I'm no mouth-piece, but software written before
> software copyright laws did not have a copyright
> to give up. IBM then also had a court order to
> try to keep it from being a monopoly. IBM also
> had to allow competitors reasonable access to
> avoid restraint of trade law suits.
> 
> If IBM nows allows unrestricted redistribution,
> please provide proof.
>
 
Perhaps they don't, legally. The fact that the turnkey CD exists and 
they haven't (that I have read) said stop distributing it says to me 
that, at the least, they don't care that much. Maybe if Fujitsu or 
somebody started giving them away by the thousand, there'd be a 
different response.
 
> > Assuming for a minute that it's not legal to modify
> >and distribute 3.8j source, what about current macros.
> >Suppose, OS/360 source in hand I decide I'm going to
> >single handedly clone z/OS. In order to be compatible,
> >at a minumum, would mean that my data areas would
> >have to be the same, like say IHAPSA. The mapping
> >macros are copyright by ibm, even though they are
> >posted on the web. So does that mean I would be
> >forbidden from writing a clone os that used the same
> >macros/field names ? As in I'd have to call my area
> >TSAGPSA and have all different names.
> 
> I'm no mouth-piece, but if you want to write your
> own zOS, go ahead. Do NOT copy any IBM Macros or
> current IBM code.

I take this to mean that you believe I would have to have completely 
different fieldnames. So I would only be able to have binary 
compatibility, since I can see no way to assemble any CBT programs 
without using the real IBM macro. New macros would have to be created 
for the clone datareas, and then each program modified to use the new 
mapping macros. Is that right ? I just wasn't clear on whether 
copyright meant you couldn't use the actual name CVTUSER.
 
> Writing zOS from scratch should keep you busy for
> many years.
> 
I expect it would, but I'm not that dedicated. I just like to tinker. 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I3w.vC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.