RE: Re: slanted article "Inside System Storage -- by Tony Pearson"
"Dave" <g4ugm-/rAkYNWUBEC+PENguQupYdBc4/[email protected]> Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:30:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <408B6B414E2C4825AB3E54619EBA06CF@EMACHINE> |
I gather that as Hercules (or perhaps another emulator) got "under way" some one realized that MVS 3.8 was still orderable from IBM. I guess perhaps that it wasn't a "program product" it wasn't "withdrawn from marketing". Any way I believe that some of the last people to get MVS from IBM do have confirmation that it can be freely re-distributed. Might be worth checking out some of the older posts on Yahoo. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:hercules- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of kerravon86 > Sent: 22 September 2010 02:38 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [hercules-advocacy] Re: slanted article "Inside System Storage -- > by Tony Pearson" > > --- In [email protected], Paul Raulerson > <paul.raulerson@...> wrote: > > > > Facts - there have to be more facts that this. > > Whatever else IBM may be, it is not stupid. And > > no matter how far IBM has turned away from we > > developers, it will always be aware of where > > the money is. > > Of course it is. Maintaining a monopoly and > strangling competition is exactly what companies > are meant to do, both morally and financially. > > It's someone else's job to break that, IBM > shouldn't have to do it themselves. Nor should > Microsoft have to be the ones to cut off their > own arm. > > > It is quite possible IBM did offer someone a > > license for z/OS on Hercules > > Actually, it's quite unlikely. Otherwise it would > have come out as part of the dispute. > > > For example, if they priced z/OS at say, > > $1,000,000 per engine or more. > > If IBM had come back with such a thing, you'd be > hearing the TurboHercules complaint starting off > with that figure and saying it is predatory > behaviour. It isn't. It's "no sale". > > > Or there could be a dozen more possibilities, > > all of which are valid from IBM's viewpoint. > > Occam's Razor will tell you that the (undisputed > by IBM) TurboHercules complaint has all the main > facts in it. You can see copies of IBM's letters > too. > > > Remember, IBM is pretty generous in the open > > source department > > Try putting that statement to them, and suggest > that they open source z/OS, and report back on how > successful you were. > > Hell, I'll settle for just getting them to put in > writing that MVS 3.8j, which is already open-sourced, > and has no copyright notice, can be legally > redistributed. > > Good luck with that one too. > > Generous? Devious! > > > Which is why I repeat that there have to be more facts than this. > > Um, no, there doesn't need to be. It's all quite > well explained already. If you were IBM, wouldn't > you do exactly what they are being accused of? I > probably would. Or else I would resign, as I would > hope that I would not implement policies that are > against the best interest of IBM, after having been > paid to do so. > > > Really best to be careful what we say. > > Unproven or unprovable things about IBM will > > come back to haunt us. > > More unfounded speculation. We already are being > haunted anyway. The whole world is haunted by > IBM and Microsoft's respective monopolies. It's > unbelievable that in a world with more > (unreasonable) anti-capitalist protestors than > you can shake a stick at, that there isn't a > permanent hippy farm parked outside of IBM and > Microsoft. > > > Eventually, IBM will be coming to an agreement > > about Hercules. > > Eventually IBM will HOPEFULLY be forced by government > legislation to end its predatory anti-capitalist > practices. The biggest danger I see is numbskulls > in the government falling for the "oh, it's just > another server" lie (which they have a history of > falling for already). > > > We all want that agreement to be the most > > beneficial for the Hercules community. > > I'm after an agreement that is most beneficial > for the business community, personally. and that > should allow PSI as a competitor to both > TurboHercules and IBM. > > BFN. Paul. > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >