RE: Re: slanted article "Inside System Storage -- by Tony Pearson"

"Dave" <g4ugm-/rAkYNWUBEC+PENguQupYdBc4/[email protected]> Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:30:13 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy
Message-ID <408B6B414E2C4825AB3E54619EBA06CF@EMACHINE>
I gather that as Hercules (or perhaps another emulator) got "under way"
some one realized that MVS 3.8 was still orderable from IBM. I guess
perhaps that it wasn't a "program product" it wasn't "withdrawn from
marketing". Any way I believe that some of the last people to get MVS
from IBM do have confirmation that it can be freely re-distributed.
Might be worth checking out some of the older posts on Yahoo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hercules-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of kerravon86
> Sent: 22 September 2010 02:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [hercules-advocacy] Re: slanted article "Inside System
Storage --
> by Tony Pearson"
> 
> --- In [email protected], Paul Raulerson
> <paul.raulerson@...> wrote:
> >
> > Facts - there have to be more facts that this.
> > Whatever else IBM may be, it is not stupid. And
> > no matter how far IBM has turned away from we
> > developers, it will always be aware of where
> > the money is.
> 
> Of course it is. Maintaining a monopoly and
> strangling competition is exactly what companies
> are meant to do, both morally and financially.
> 
> It's someone else's job to break that, IBM
> shouldn't have to do it themselves. Nor should
> Microsoft have to be the ones to cut off their
> own arm.
> 
> > It is quite possible IBM did offer someone a
> > license for z/OS on Hercules
> 
> Actually, it's quite unlikely. Otherwise it would
> have come out as part of the dispute.
> 
> > For example, if they priced z/OS at say,
> > $1,000,000 per engine or more.
> 
> If IBM had come back with such a thing, you'd be
> hearing the TurboHercules complaint starting off
> with that figure and saying it is predatory
> behaviour.  It isn't.  It's "no sale".
> 
> > Or there could be a dozen more possibilities,
> > all of which are valid from IBM's viewpoint.
> 
> Occam's Razor will tell you that the (undisputed
> by IBM) TurboHercules complaint has all the main
> facts in it. You can see copies of IBM's letters
> too.
> 
> > Remember, IBM is pretty generous in the open
> > source department
> 
> Try putting that statement to them, and suggest
> that they open source z/OS, and report back on how
> successful you were.
> 
> Hell, I'll settle for just getting them to put in
> writing that MVS 3.8j, which is already open-sourced,
> and has no copyright notice, can be legally
> redistributed.
> 
> Good luck with that one too.
> 
> Generous?  Devious!
> 
> > Which is why I repeat that there have to be more facts than this.
> 
> Um, no, there doesn't need to be. It's all quite
> well explained already. If you were IBM, wouldn't
> you do exactly what they are being accused of? I
> probably would. Or else I would resign, as I would
> hope that I would not implement policies that are
> against the best interest of IBM, after having been
> paid to do so.
> 
> > Really best to be careful what we say.
> > Unproven or unprovable things about IBM will
> > come back to haunt us.
> 
> More unfounded speculation. We already are being
> haunted anyway. The whole world is haunted by
> IBM and Microsoft's respective monopolies. It's
> unbelievable that in a world with more
> (unreasonable) anti-capitalist protestors than
> you can shake a stick at, that there isn't a
> permanent hippy farm parked outside of IBM and
> Microsoft.
> 
> > Eventually, IBM will be coming to an agreement
> > about Hercules.
> 
> Eventually IBM will HOPEFULLY be forced by government
> legislation to end its predatory anti-capitalist
> practices. The biggest danger I see is numbskulls
> in the government falling for the "oh, it's just
> another server" lie (which they have a history of
> falling for already).
> 
> > We all want that agreement to be the most
> > beneficial for the Hercules community.
> 
> I'm after an agreement that is most beneficial
> for the business community, personally. and that
> should allow PSI as a competitor to both
> TurboHercules and IBM.
> 
> BFN.  Paul.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>