RE: Re: Wait State 00050064
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.mvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joe, Well the ES/9000 Functional Characteristics says that “MVS/SP Version 1 Release 3.5” will run in an LAPR Dave From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: 21 September 2019 16:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [H390-MVS] Re: Wait State 00050064 The first version of MVS that supported LPARs was MVS/SP V2R1. Thus, OS/VS2 ver 3.8J would not know about LPARs. Joe On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:41 AM ''Fish' (David B. Trout)' [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [H390-MVS] <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Dave Wade wrote: [...] > was the LPAR number hidden from the OS.... > .... do S/370 OS's know about LPARs and how should > Hercules behave when one is defined. > > Perhaps Hercules is behaving badly... I would tend to agree. I personally questioned the behavior (by Mark Gaubtaz (dasdman) back in Sept. 2013) which is what lead to my eventual introduction of the "Limited automatic LPARNUM updating when setting certain architecture modes" change in Hyperion 4.1 (https://sdl-hercules-390.github.io/html/hercrnot.html#4.1), but he insisted such handling was correct, and I felt he was in a better position to know than me (having worked at Amdahl for many years and having access to documents unavailable to the general public). <shrug> -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>