Re: Powrprof patches
Stefan Dösinger <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:24:04 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Am 19.02.2025 um 23:38 schrieb robert lippmann <[email protected]>: > > Some more follow up questions: > > 1) Since there are a lot of new functions added, should I do an initial patch with winedump producing skeleton code, and have each function just return ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED? And then do follow on patches to implement? Or just do the implementation at the same time? From a review standpoint, I imagine the first approach is better. The first approach is generally better. Make sure that every function writes a FIXME to make it obvious a stub is called. > 2) A bunch of power related GUIDs are defined in winnt.h in the Windows SDK. It seems like they should be in the power headers. Should I follow the SDK? Yeah, follow the SDK. At least in theory our headers should be a drop in replacement for Microsoft's, although in practice that doesn't get tested much. > 3) For new files I’ll need to create, do I set the copyright name to me? Or Alexandre? Yourself