RE: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list

David Brodbeck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cipe
Message-ID <C823AC1DB499D511BB7C00B0D0F0574C584146@serverdell2200.interclean.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric M. Hopper [mailto:[email protected]]

> I also strongly agree with your other points.  Peter 
> Gutmann's analysis
> is unecessarily incendiary (thus one is tempted to dismiss it
> out-of-hand), and has some minor flaws, but the vulnerabilities he
> exposes are real, and should be addressed.

This is true.  However, I don't thinke Peter was arguing that cIPe should be
fixed, I think he was arguing that it should be abandoned and people should
switch to IPSec or SSL/SSH.

--
Message sent by the [email protected] mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail [email protected], "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.