Re: Replays - thoughts on Gutmann response
"Eric M. Hopper" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cipe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Omnifarious Software |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 18:36, Sandino Araico Sanchez wrote: > If we use TCP instead of UDP for key exchange the replay problem can be > worked around and there's no performance impact since there's no TCP > over TCP encapsulation in key exchange. > > There's lower complexity using UDP exclusively for traffic and TCP > exclusively for key exchange since we don't need to find out if the > received UDP package contains a package or a key. When we are sure no > UDP package contains a key we just need to check integrity, decrypt the > encapsulated package and pass it to the upper layer so the process is > simplified. First, that makes key exchanges easy to find, though I consider that a minor problem. The biggest problem is that TCP is much harder to get through a NAT or firewall than UDP is. *sigh*, -- There's an excellent C/C++/Python/Unix/Linux programmer with a wide range of other experience and system admin skills who needs work. Namely, me. http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/resume.html -- Eric Hopper <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 185 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/g5ejjtsvlOwvazYRAuBRAJ9GtBvqCHfvxJHrzLIy1oMYpIBQFQCglUZa WWUdd2xPtUKB7kiHGCHmSfM= =4NUQ -----END PGP MESSAGE-----