Re: Replays - thoughts on Gutmann response

"Eric M. Hopper" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cipe
Organization Omnifarious Software
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 18:36, Sandino Araico Sanchez wrote:
> If we use TCP instead of UDP for key exchange the replay problem can be 
> worked around and there's no performance impact since there's no TCP 
> over TCP encapsulation in key exchange.
> 
> There's lower complexity using UDP exclusively for traffic and TCP 
> exclusively for key exchange since we don't need  to find out if the 
> received UDP package contains a package or a key. When we are sure no 
> UDP package contains a key we just need to check integrity, decrypt the 
> encapsulated package and pass it to the upper layer so the process is 
> simplified.

First, that makes key exchanges easy to find, though I consider that a
minor problem.

The biggest problem is that TCP is much harder to get through a NAT or
firewall than UDP is.

*sigh*,
--
There's an excellent C/C++/Python/Unix/Linux programmer with a wide
range of other experience and system admin skills who needs work.
Namely, me. http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/resume.html
-- Eric Hopper <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 185 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/g5ejjtsvlOwvazYRAuBRAJ9GtBvqCHfvxJHrzLIy1oMYpIBQFQCglUZa
WWUdd2xPtUKB7kiHGCHmSfM=
=4NUQ
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.