Re: Replays - thoughts on Gutmann response
"Eric M. Hopper" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cipe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Omnifarious Software |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:05, David Lang wrote: > actually I would say exactly the opposite, TCP is MUCH easier to route > through a firewall and NAT the UDP is. I had a tunnel through my workplace's firewall at my last job. I set it up only having any control of my firewall at home. I had no control of the firewall at work, and while the IT guy permitted the tunnel, I wouldn't have gotten it had he had to modify the firewall at his end. Now, can you explain to me how my computer at home could've initiated a TCP connection for a key exchange to my computer at work? BTW, it had no problems initiating a key exchange via UDP. Thanks, -- There's an excellent C/C++/Python/Unix/Linux programmer with a wide range of other experience and system admin skills who needs work. Namely, me. http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/resume.html -- Eric Hopper <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 185 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/g5+ejtsvlOwvazYRAltMAKDS4KPqZJLGMjqeK65DH92nRVMJogCfcJpt fDu3g7pJSNivjt+Xsk8Q51s= =hXlH -----END PGP MESSAGE-----