Re: License clarifications
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.cryptlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/08/2011 04:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > It seems that Cryptlib's license is not GPL-compatible at all, despite > what the web site says: the bignum implementation is licensed under the > OpenSSL license, which is considered GPL-incompatible for historic > reasons (it's similar to the four-clause BSD license). it's more than bn/, crypt/ is also under the OpenSSL license, as i reported here: https://www.debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/74 > Apparently, the Sleepycat license was amended to clarify its application > to SaaS configurations, in the spirit of the Affero GPL. The GPL, > version 3, requires that licensees are permitted to redistribute covered > works to SaaS providers and subcontractors, provided that the recipients > do not receive any rights under copyright. With a broad interpretation > of redistribution, the Sleepycat license would not allow this and thus > constitute a further restriction, making it incompatible with the GPLv3. > (This is a defect in the GPLv3, which is no longer a strong copyleft > license.) I don't understand this particular critique of the intersection between sleepycat and GPLv3, though i suppose this list is probably the wrong place to have the discussion. if you want to send me a pointer for more reading off-list, i'd appreciate it. > I don't think those licensing aspects are that important because we're > still covered by the free license, but perhaps it's possible to clarify > the licensing situation in some way. I agree that a clarification would be good. --dkg _______________________________________________ Cryptlib mailing list [email protected] via Mail: [email protected] Archive: ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/crypt/cryptlib/archives/ http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.cryptlib Posts from non-subscribed addresses are blocked to prevent spam, please subscribe in order to post messages.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 1 KB)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJOP/+2XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpcUUP/i5WkRXpSPM740YxtKOCNRq9 EW+FeEQ7UKG5AjE57DkebwVNm7hMV0pdueNtuG4Rmj8zK8iJ+09sbYvRIucJNGM3 YZTUVdXY1h7+6iwk53Ofbe48WXa/DooH/cv9jQ3f/fVXfVsP3B84682Ebkvgkiyi JSBQjkxDFKiRGLfKkFLbHoV9bKBglqr/ZjulrVjTMH4Qkcc8Kxmpz70WriPu9DG2 uJJK5sgSJrEgMYHBGgsuH6uKX/NGbezRDz4bumXEk/YxOGaQxT0iSCx8qrIyDS2P X67fuhSZqEFhzL1Hc53FeyPt1g3SbvSWWsMYGpox6I7JXf0YOYWpZhSNenrS0SCx +KQCxDB1NX0SjNrHUIcNwbDeqqTYr1mv7UgsEyL9kK7fyLaXILbVXDHvrAJbM38/ eYGt05G2cB3527yc8b4e7BXpq66DRdg9IFxf7bBs1gtuV8Wh6mkCnuOgEjhepWeW U1gvV7+Pji05bKbjLl6+QLZMTqbZ7KhmOsoQeLjYc5i78apRB4YOUJYCBSSi0e+T t3ggeuOSGYla4RP+jesen/OI/DHRKvwmOy6GO2UZqm6AxB9BGxcGCqc6ZhhJUqh1 B0/AxKi9Ph4AmkP42k2Lu76htR8B7mPL+j4bAyzVBrl95wNGTmy367sIF1P6vNbN fGcFrJK8ifaSKr1QZpq6 =ycRJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----