Re: License clarifications

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.cryptlib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 08/08/2011 04:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It seems that Cryptlib's license is not GPL-compatible at all, despite
> what the web site says: the bignum implementation is licensed under the
> OpenSSL license, which is considered GPL-incompatible for historic
> reasons (it's similar to the four-clause BSD license).

it's more than bn/, crypt/ is also under the OpenSSL license, as i
reported here:

 https://www.debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/74

> Apparently, the Sleepycat license was amended to clarify its application
> to SaaS configurations, in the spirit of the Affero GPL.  The GPL,
> version 3, requires that licensees are permitted to redistribute covered
> works to SaaS providers and subcontractors, provided that the recipients
> do not receive any rights under copyright.  With a broad interpretation
> of redistribution, the Sleepycat license would not allow this and thus
> constitute a further restriction, making it incompatible with the GPLv3.
> (This is a defect in the GPLv3, which is no longer a strong copyleft
> license.)

I don't understand this particular critique of the intersection between
sleepycat and GPLv3, though i suppose this list is probably the wrong
place to have the discussion.  if you want to send me a pointer for more
reading off-list, i'd appreciate it.

> I don't think those licensing aspects are that important because we're
> still covered by the free license, but perhaps it's possible to clarify
> the licensing situation in some way.

I agree that a clarification would be good.

	--dkg

_______________________________________________
Cryptlib mailing list
[email protected] via Mail: [email protected]
Archive: ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/crypt/cryptlib/archives/
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.cryptlib
Posts from non-subscribed addresses are blocked to prevent spam, please
subscribe in order to post messages.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 1 KB)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=ycRJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.