Re: Future of GpgME python bindings on PyPi

Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel
Message-ID <2739655.vuYhMxLoTh@daneel>
On Mittwoch, 19. März 2025 00:17:18 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Lucas Hoffmann 
via Gnupg-devel wrote:
> Quoting Ingo Klöcker (2025-03-18 21:27:03)
> 
> > I think now that we have finally dropped support for Python 2 the build
> > could be modernized. Patches are welcome.
> 
> Are you talking about the pyproject.toml file that emerged in the python
> ecosystem?  I think it is possible to move some metadata from setup.py
> to this file and also specify the minimum requirement for setuptools.
> That could free the code of the distutils references.

I think that's what I had in mind. It's been some time since I last looked 
into Python packaging.

> If that is desired I can try to prepare a patch and send it to the list.

That would be great.

Regards,
Ingo

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCZ9qIVgAKCRCxb1mVFkdK
ukLtAQCKmU4tIEoxH3QmUL8THgNT/90ngcUemJp+kj4oF/oHWAEApOdub1avWuA3
T8sGy8VaGoRn7l3lwsKS3GuDITszQQQ=
=zNUy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.