Re: GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?
"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> To me, and I believe most people, "obsolete" does *not* mean "we can > drop support right now". It just means it is time to deprecate it. The > way that happens for wire formats (at least those who have a version > marker) is always the same: From Merriam-Webster's online dictionary: "obsolete: no longer in use or no longer useful." Yes, if something is obsolete it is to be dropped. You are confusing obsolete with obsolescent: "obsolescent: going out of use : becoming obsolete" If it's obsolescent, deprecate it. If it's obsolete, get rid of it. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQR9jsS4W2/t1sENPHkeepTU6H+R1QUCaRP1lgUDAAAAAAAKCRAeepTU6H+R1Utu AQDM4mDsj5+57ZD/95z/kF3hS73gWjZ5omy0i7H2cOar0wD/eaBLE8j4mgD29r3zbU5OU8reiXQ7 9lrh0PbwdFO6WAk= =/tqC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----