Re: GnuPG 2.4.4 still using legacy packets?
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:59, Andrew Gallagher said: > RFC9580 are named individuals - three of whom currently work on PGP > software, and one of those (Niibe) works on GnuPG. Your insinuation Just for the recods: After we finished the core of rfc4880bis and solved the litigous things in Summer 2021, I stepped out due to my time constraints. Only editorial changes were planned ay the point and thus I asked the design team to have my colleague Niibe-san to replace me. Actually he planned to bring his Simple Octet String proposal forward which makes the encoding of certain objects easier to describe. That is the background why he is given as author. I explictly asked the new editor to drop me from the list of authors, when I realized that they did substantial changes instead of just editorial changes. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service. - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 284 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJ8EARYKAEcWIQSHd0YfKgdOvEgNNZQZzByeCFsQegUCaRSDHhsUgAAAAAAEAA5t YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMSwyLDINHHdrQGdudXBnLm9yZwAKCRAZzByeCFsQemM1AP0Q AmVDaLgEaFqBPLEpBrYhJnGTSsxHPB6kZbbt0JWczQD/eiGy2IGlOsBemO1Is4mD NQ6vge2M/8laD8dMtPetmA0= =i2Jj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----