stinkfoot testing SKS and onak (was Re: Shouldn't keyservers store and provide subkeys?)

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:57:52PM -0500, Ethan Weinstein wrote:

> I suppose I'll chime in here.  I'm finally going to trash PKS in the
> coming days, sad but true.  I've been playing around with SKS recently,
> and it seems fairly stable.  I'd forgotten about onak, I'll give it a
> try as well.  I'll [obviously] let my sync partners know what I
> eventually decide to do.

Seeing that you had already started testing SKS by Saturday, I stopped
sending you email syncs and added you to my ./membership file for my
(test) SKS server instead.  Add "skylane.kjsl.com 21370" to yours
and you'll catch up on those 2727 keys you're currently missing:

  http://keyserver.stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats
  http://keyserver.gurski.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats

When testing onak, you'll want this extra data (photo IDs, etc.) too.

BTW, if you did a SKS fastbuild (esp. from your pks keydump), you can
use -dump_new_only to get only the new data (full keys) that isn't in
the base keydump.

-- 
Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
[email protected] _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004

_______________________________________________
pgp-keyserver-folk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.kjsl.com/mailman/listinfo/pgp-keyserver-folk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iJoEARECAFoFAkJG5adTGGh0dHA6Ly9rZXlzZXJ2ZXIua2pzbC5jb206ODAvcGtz
L2xvb2t1cD9vcD1nZXQmc2VhcmNoPTB4RDM5REEwRTMmd2VoYXZleW91bm93PXRy
dWUACgkQSypIl9OdoOMz4wCgiDVnABvnYzs7sFW14gmJB2iixuQAnj15cWlhuUbo
kJ6B72mzHAgDksTY
=AWcJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----