Re: stinkfoot testing SKS and onak (was Re: Shouldn't keyservers store and provide subkeys?)

Jason Harris wrote:

> 
> Seeing that you had already started testing SKS by Saturday, I stopped
> sending you email syncs and added you to my ./membership file for my
> (test) SKS server instead.  Add "skylane.kjsl.com 21370" to yours
> and you'll catch up on those 2727 keys you're currently missing:
> 
>   http://keyserver.stinkfoot.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats
>   http://keyserver.gurski.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats

Done, seems to be happy.

> 
> When testing onak, you'll want this extra data (photo IDs, etc.) too.
> 
> BTW, if you did a SKS fastbuild (esp. from your pks keydump), you can
> use -dump_new_only to get only the new data (full keys) that isn't in
> the base keydump.
> 

I didn't do the fastbuild =)  I've used db_dump do back the databases up 
for the past few nights.