Re: [PATCH] 00/13 e2fsprogs-1.39 extent checking improvements

On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:24 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I've created an updated patchset (as discussed on the ext4 concall) with
> improved checking for the extents format, as well as improved checking
> for corrupted indirect/index blocks.  In addition, there are a bunch of
> cleanups to e2fsprogs that I have already submitted to Ted.

I was on the call, but had to step away to attend to other business...
Was this patchset intended to supplant or augment the 48bitext3
patchset? Or neither? I ask because I see things in one that aren't in
the other and vice versa, but the two collide in a few places. Haven't
yet started in on the collisions to try to resolve them, thought I'd get
clarification first.

Thank you,

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
Ext2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBE0OqFtO+bni+75QMRAh2EAJ9EXR5L8jQp3wieqqlJya2ysq1KbACfTuXc
FHikp8Yk1zrC116fa9PZMl8=
=BPTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----