Re: Registry based vldb and file server preferences

Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.file-systems.openafs.devel.win32
Organization Not Affiliated with Columbia University in the City of New York
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The purpose of these registry options is to allow organizations
which distribute transformed MSIs to their end users to include
as part of the installation a default set of server preferences
which will be loaded at AFS Client Service start time.  These
values can be overrided by a user with "AFS Client Admin" privileges
using the AFS Control Panel "Set Prefs" page or the "fs setserverprefs"
command.

These registry options can also be used by organizations which
manage Windows workstations via Group Policy to assign different
sets of server preferences to machines located in different OUs.
What these organizations currently do is execute an "fs setserverprefs" 
command as part of the login process.

I am not currently contemplating writing code to monitor the IP
routing tables and determine under which circumstances the current 
server preferences should be replaced by an alternate set.

Jeffrey Altman


Dan Pritts wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:41:18PM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> 
>>	HKLM\SOFTWARE\OpenAFS\Client\ServerPrefs\VLDB\<ip-address>
>>	HKLM\SOFTWARE\OpenAFS\Client\ServerPrefs\File\<ip-address>
>>
>>in which if your IP address matches, then the initial values would be 
>>loaded from the subkey.  The only problem I see with this is that the
>>machine's ip-address might not be available when the afs client service 
>>starts.
> 
> 
> ...and you might be moving around a lot.  Say I suspend my machine
> and go to my other site and wake it up, get an address where i'd want
> the now-local server, but i'm still defaulting to using the original
> site.  
> 
> Other than that I like the idea, although instead of 'ip-address' i'd
> implement it as 'cidr-block'.  Probably what you meant, anyway.
> 
> I can't remember the current algorithm for how this is determined.
> and/or, what problem you're trying to solve by adding this.
> Would the existing runtime process for keeping this updated
> change?
> 
> danno
> --
> dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2
> 734/352-4953 office        734/834-7224 mobile
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.2 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.