Some thoughts on merging 0install.net and 0install.de
"Bastian Eicher" <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:46:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
0install.net is an English website with a focus on the original version Zero Install for Linux. 0install.de is an English and German website with a focus on Zero Install for Windows. The following is a discussion on merging these two sites. > On 26 July 2016 at 14:08, Bastian Eicher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I have just finished a few small design changes on 0install.de to bring the > > look closer to 0install.net. This got me thinking about the possibility of > > merging 0install.net and 0install.de again. From the perspective of an > > end-user the separation probably seems somewhat arbitrary and confusing. > > > > Perhaps we could take individual steps like these: > > 1. Align the visual design of the two websites as close as possible. > > 2. Design a common landing page for both sites. > > 3. Design a common navigation bar for both sites. > > 4. Host the content of both sites under the same domain name. We could keep > > 0install.net content as static HTML files and 0install.de content as > > WordPress-generated, since the file names / URIs do not collide. > > 5. Move some content from static HTML files to WordPress to add > > multilingual/translation support. > > > > What do you think about this? Do you have any concerns or different ideas? > > > > Regards > > Bastian > > On 28 July 2016 at 21:53, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, it would be good to bring these closer together. Would adding > another subdomain be useful? e.g. docs.0install.net or something? > > The main problem I have with dynamic sites is that they tend to get > hacked after a while, and then it takes effort to clean it all up. I > did attempt to move it to github pages > (https://0install.github.io/web-site/) though ideally I'd like to have > something handle the php bug-reporter link, which github doesn't > support. > > We should probably discuss it on the mailing list... I agree that static websites are preferable from a security standpoint. However, using WordPress for 0install.de has provided a few advantages for me: * Logic for navigation, menus, shared title bars, etc. comes "for free". * I use WordPress' user account features for 0install.de Sync. I did not have to build features like sign-up, forgot password, etc. myself. * There are a bunch of ready-made plugins that implement "boring" stuff such contact forms and language switching. * I can edit the website from my smartphone. ;) The recurring theme with all this is: It saves me time that it can instead spend tinkering on Zero Install itself. I host 0install.de on a dedicated VM. I create daily offline backups and can rebuild everything from scratch using Puppet in about an hour. While this setup does have a lot more moving parts than static hosting and naturally can never be bullet-proof, I am reasonably confident in the security of the current setup. Any recommendations on how to further improve this are very welcome! @Thomas: Regarding the docs.0install.net subdomain idea: Which content would you envision there? Mainly the technical details, making the main page more end-user focused? @All: Any other ideas how to bridge the gap between the two pages? Perhaps somebody with mad CSS-fu skills interested in lending a hand? Regards Bastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------