Re: Some thoughts on merging 0install.net and 0install.de

On 31 July 2016 at 19:46, Bastian Eicher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 0install.net is an English website with a focus on the original version Zero Install for Linux.
> 0install.de is an English and German website with a focus on Zero Install for Windows.
> The following is a discussion on merging these two sites.
>
>> On 26 July 2016 at 14:08, Bastian Eicher <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> >
>> > I have just finished a few small design changes on 0install.de to bring the
>> > look closer to 0install.net. This got me thinking about the possibility of
>> > merging 0install.net and 0install.de again. From the perspective of an
>> > end-user the separation probably seems somewhat arbitrary and confusing.
>> >
>> > Perhaps we could take individual steps like these:
>> > 1. Align the visual design of the two websites as close as possible.
>> > 2. Design a common landing page for both sites.
>> > 3. Design a common navigation bar for both sites.
>> > 4. Host the content of both sites under the same domain name. We could keep
>> > 0install.net content as static HTML files and 0install.de content as
>> > WordPress-generated, since the file names / URIs do not collide.
>> > 5. Move some content from static HTML files to WordPress to add
>> > multilingual/translation support.
>> >
>> > What do you think about this? Do you have any concerns or different ideas?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Bastian
>>
>> On 28 July 2016 at 21:53, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yeah, it would be good to bring these closer together. Would adding
>> another subdomain be useful? e.g. docs.0install.net or something?
>>
>> The main problem I have with dynamic sites is that they tend to get
>> hacked after a while, and then it takes effort to clean it all up. I
>> did attempt to move it to github pages
>> (https://0install.github.io/web-site/) though ideally I'd like to have
>> something handle the php bug-reporter link, which github doesn't
>> support.
>>
>> We should probably discuss it on the mailing list...
>
> I agree that static websites are preferable from a security standpoint. However, using WordPress for 0install.de has provided a few advantages for me:
>  * Logic for navigation, menus, shared title bars, etc. comes "for free".
>  * I use WordPress' user account features for 0install.de Sync. I did not have to build features like sign-up, forgot password, etc. myself.
>  * There are a bunch of ready-made plugins that implement "boring" stuff such contact forms and language switching.
>  * I can edit the website from my smartphone. ;)
> The recurring theme with all this is: It saves me time that it can instead spend tinkering on Zero Install itself.
>
> I host 0install.de on a dedicated VM. I create daily offline backups and can rebuild everything from scratch using Puppet in about an hour.
> While this setup does have a lot more moving parts than static hosting and naturally can never be bullet-proof, I am reasonably confident in the security of the current setup.
> Any recommendations on how to further improve this are very welcome!
>
> @Thomas: Regarding the docs.0install.net subdomain idea: Which content would you envision there? Mainly the technical details, making the main page more end-user focused?

We could perhaps have a static landing page (so there is still
something there if the database is down), but redirect some of the
other pages to docs.0install.net (possibly more over time).

> @All: Any other ideas how to bridge the gap between the two pages? Perhaps somebody with mad CSS-fu skills interested in lending a hand?

(note: I'll be mostly offline for the next week and a bit)


-- 
talex5 (GitHub/Twitter)        http://roscidus.com/blog/
GPG: 5DD5 8D70 899C 454A 966D  6A51 7513 3C8F 94F6 E0CC
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------