Re: Armv6l vs armv7l
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:07:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG4opy_rUnk2uee4hWbu=B6RatyJSe3_NtD-3EEHo4+0ud=hvg@mail.gmail.com> |
On 2 April 2017 at 05:14, Eric Duhamel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On April 1, 2017 5:09:33 AM PDT, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>Yes, it should do. What OS are you using? If you have the GUI, you can >>right-click on the package version and choose "Explain this decision" >>from the menu to find out why it didn't use it. > > Debian 8.7 > > Specifically Bone Debian for the Beaglebone Black > > Under the Versions tab it shows that it skipped three Versions listed as (package). That is the version already installed by my OS, right? Under Arch says "*-armv6l" and "explain this decision" says "Not compatible with the requested CPU type". Odd ;-) Does that happen even if you ask for that specific CPU type, e.g. 0install add 00install http://0install.net/tools/0install.xml --cpu=armv6l -- talex5 (GitHub/Twitter) http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: 5DD5 8D70 899C 454A 966D 6A51 7513 3C8F 94F6 E0CC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot