Re: Armv6l vs armv7l
Eric Duhamel <[email protected]> Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:10:41 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On April 2, 2017 1:07:43 PM PDT, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2 April 2017 at 05:14, Eric Duhamel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Under the Versions tab it shows that it skipped three Versions listed >as (package). That is the version already installed by my OS, right? >Under Arch says "*-armv6l" and "explain this decision" says "Not >compatible with the requested CPU type". Odd ;-) > >Does that happen even if you ask for that specific CPU type, e.g. > >0install add 00install http://0install.net/tools/0install.xml >--cpu=armv6l Nope, that works flawlessy. Problem solved! It's kind of amazing that 0install can "install" itself. This will help me a lot in the future since I have problems with outdated 0install packages all the time. -- Eric Duhamel http://www.noxbanners.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot