Re: libofx 0.7.0

Thomas Bushnell BSG <[email protected]> 10 Jan 2005 14:27:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.finance.libofx.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Benoit GrĂ©goire <[email protected]> writes:

> On Monday 10 January 2005 15:31, you wrote:
> > Version 0.7.0 of libofx is not compatible with version 0.6.*, but the
> > soname was not bumped.  Is there a reason??
> >
> > Thomas (Debian maintainer of libofx)
> 
> I had several people tell me that, but I still can't figure it out.  
> 
> libofx 0.6.6 should be libofx.so.0.0.6
> libofx 0.6.6 should be libofx.so.1.0.0 (now switched to libtool convention)
> 
> What was the soname of 0.6.6 on debian?

I'm sorry; I was confused.  I had made a mistake, fixed it partially,
and then failed to fully understand the situation before I sent you
email.

I think everything is right with libofx, though if you hear reports or
complaints from Debian unstable users, tell them to complain to me. ;)





-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt