Re: libofx 0.7.0
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[email protected]> 10 Jan 2005 14:27:35 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.finance.libofx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Benoit Grégoire <[email protected]> writes: > On Monday 10 January 2005 15:31, you wrote: > > Version 0.7.0 of libofx is not compatible with version 0.6.*, but the > > soname was not bumped. Is there a reason?? > > > > Thomas (Debian maintainer of libofx) > > I had several people tell me that, but I still can't figure it out. > > libofx 0.6.6 should be libofx.so.0.0.6 > libofx 0.6.6 should be libofx.so.1.0.0 (now switched to libtool convention) > > What was the soname of 0.6.6 on debian? I'm sorry; I was confused. I had made a mistake, fixed it partially, and then failed to fully understand the situation before I sent you email. I think everything is right with libofx, though if you hear reports or complaints from Debian unstable users, tell them to complain to me. ;) ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt