Re: Progress in AqBanking OFX-backend

On Thursday 21 April 2005 15:56, Ace Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:15:02PM -0400, Benoit Grégoire wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 April 2005 14:40, Martin Preuss wrote:
> > > > > @Benoit: How do we proceed now ?
> > > >
> > > > Coding is going to take less time than arguing, and will most likely
> > > > make more people happy ;)
> >
> > I meant that ME coding what I mean (and which you don't seem to
> > understand yet) is going to take less time than arguing about it until
> > you do.
>
> Ok, could we at least put something in for prototype purposes, so real
> people can try all this stuff out?  How about this...?
>
> Somehow, code which uses OFX Direct Connect needs to fill in the
> OfxFiLogin and OfxAccountInfo structures.  They can only do this fully
> by examining the information returned from the Account Info request,
> which one would logically parse using libOFX.
>
> So, could we add a DirectConnectInfo field to the AccountData structure,
> which would contain an OfxFiLogin and OfxAccountInfo structure?
>
> Alternately, could we add a new callback that would return these 2
> structures for each account?
>
> Either of these solutions would at least allow Direct Connect to be
> fully usable in end applications without a major API rework.  When major
> API changes were done, then this could be revisited.
>
> Thoughts?

Ok, look, just add the fields to OfxAccountInfo.

As the 0.7 series was only an interim release to allow kmymoney to use the 
library, and was not meant as an API where backward compatibility would be 
maintained, I guess it not too binding for the future.

-- 
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCaW3QmZ6zzPlLuwMRAnluAJsF6TzFXWZN3omd7nJylIPemD/jHgCdFdk2
UURcpoMGV1zDIiVW61ExmFA=
=G36W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----