Re: whither Moneydance?

Gordon Alley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.finance.moneydance.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As to how to remove accounts from the sidebar: just select the account and
click on the big minus sign at the bottom of the sidebar.

-Gordon

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Stan <stanftw-/[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm with you, Chuck.  I don't see the point to releasing new builds just to
> show it's still being developed, in some sort of dog-and-pony show.
>
> I have to say, though, that I'm confused about something to do with
> upgrading/purchasing.  This post reminded me that I had been wanting to try
> the new version, so I finally installed it.
>
> First of all, it says I can add 0 transactions manually before being
> required to purchase it.  I assume that's because I already have, I can't
> even guess how many, transactions in my file.  But it's not much of a trial
> if I can't add any transactions, is it??
>
> Secondly, http://moneydance.com/purchase says it's $39.99, or I can
> upgrade
> my old version for $19.99.  I passed the serial key test, and was just
> about
> to supply a credit card number when I noticed, HEY! the order form says
> it's
> going to be $24.99 for the upgrade ($49.99 for a new purchase).
>
> What gives?  I admit it's something of a fine line, but at $20, I'm not
> batting an eye, at $25, maybe I'll wait until next month's budget is done.
> But of course, it's the principle, telling me it's one price, then trying
> to
> charge me more, that really got me...
>
> And, of course, I apparently can't use it at all until I fork out the cash,
> even though I just installed it today.  Not crazy about this arrangement at
> all!
>
> And while I'm griping, did we ever find out how to make old, defunct
> accounts disappear from the sidebar?  I have a LOT of history in
> Moneydance,
> and do not need quick access to the Bank of America checking account that I
> closed in 1995 (I'm not kidding).  I was just getting to like the side bar,
> but clutter like that renders it just about useless, for me...
>
> Stan
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:22:33 -0700 (PDT), Chuck <chuckf410-/[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Its been four months already? That's impressive.
> >
> > I guess that I've not noticed its been so long because its been
> > working just fine for me.
> >
> > Thanks for the great work Sean and Co.! You've found the balance in
> > providing builds when needed to make improvements and then let the
> > users have stability when new builds are not warranted.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> > "It is sometimes a mistake to climb;
> > it is always a mistake never even to make the attempt"
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Marc Bizer <[email protected]>
> >> To: General discussion related to Moneydance <moneydance-
> >> [email protected]> Sent: Fri, September 17, 2010 10:20:21 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [moneydance] whither Moneydance?
> >>
> >> Frequently? As I wrote, there hasn't been one in 4  months!
> >>
> >> --Marc
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:21 AM, Steve Lessard  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sean and team have spoiled us. I wish more software companies
> >>> would put out
> >>>
> >> updated builds as frequently as the Moneydance team does.
> >>
> >>> Keep up the great work!
> >>>
> >>> -SteveL
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Marc Bizer  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Sean Reilly wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Also, Moneydance 2010r3 (build 751) was a non-beta release.
> >>>>
> >>> That's weird. When I download the file
> >> http://moneydance.com/download/2010/MacOS_X/Moneydance.zip, "get
> >> info" says "2010 beta" under version, and the create/mod date is
> >> 5/25/10 (almost 4 months ago).
> >>
> >>>
> >>> --Marc
>

-- 
Gordon B. Alley
http://www.gordonalley.com
http://facebook.com/gordonalley
http://twitter.com/gordonalley
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gordonalley
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.