Re: whither Moneydance?

But beyond that, one of the things that drove me away from the Q-word (and 
irritates me about lots of other software) was that, every year, they put 
out a new version because that's their marketing model.  Doesn't matter 
whether there was a good reason to do so or not, they'd add a bunch of bloat 
in useless features I didn't want and would never use, all so they could put 
out something "new."  Every several years, I'd play along, but by no means 
did I see any reason to pay for an upgrade every year, and I guess I wasn't 
alone in that, so they squeezed us any way they could, even through coercion 
of financial institutions.

Which reminds me, I paid $29.99 for Moneydance on 7/22/2005, and not a penny 
since then, through countless fixes, patches, minor upgrades, and other 
improvements.  I've gotta admit, that's pretty sweet...

Stan


On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:21:40 -0700, Steve Lessard 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Sean and team have spoiled us. I wish more software companies would
> put out updated builds as frequently as the Moneydance team does.
>
> Keep up the great work!
>
> -SteveL
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Marc Bizer wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Sean Reilly wrote:
>
>> Also, Moneydance 2010r3 (build 751) was a non-beta release.
>>
> That's weird. When I download the file
> http://moneydance.com/download/2010/MacOS_X/Moneydance.zip, "get
> info" says "2010 beta" under version, and the create/mod date is
> 5/25/10 (almost 4 months ago).
>
> --Marc
> _______________________________________________
> moneydance-info mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info
>
> _______________________________________________
> moneydance-info mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://moneydance.com/mailman/listinfo/moneydance-info