Re: Archiving

Edward Reid <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.finance.moneydance.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 1/24/2011 06:54 PM -0500, John B. Egger wrote:
>Somebody MUST be using this function... or does everyone just let his
>primary data file grow and grow?

I let mine grow. I see no point in trimming a personal financial 
record. (Businesses have different requirements.) Mine has grown to 
almost 6MB and contains transactions back to the beginning of 1993, 
when I started using Quicken. I had used Managing Your Money 
previously but was unable to reasonably convert those records.

Storing a 6MB file and 25 backups today costs far less than storing a 
600KB file and 2 backups did 18 years ago, and processing and 
searching it is far faster. I have about 15,000 photographs on my 
computer, consuming the same space as about 5,000 copies of my MD file.

It's pretty rare that I need to look at a 15-year-old transaction, 
but it happens. For one thing, it's a record of what was going on in 
my life at various times. If I can't find it in my email archives, I 
may find it in MD.

It's also very rare for the old transactions to get in my way. 
There's no processing time cost that I can notice.

So my advice is, if you have a FUNCTIONAL reason for archiving / 
trimming, then of course do it (and I'm sorry I can't help with the 
issue you have). Otherwise, let it grow.

Edward
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.